Quick Answer: Was The Sherman A Bad Tank?

How many Shermans does it take to destroy a tiger?

A 5:1 ratio.

If (as was far more common) you have 2 Tigers versus 20 Shermans, then the 2 Tigers will likely be destroyed for the loss of only 2 Shermans.

A 1:1 ratio.

Generally a platoon a Shermans 4-5 tanks would tackle a Tiger I..

What weapon killed the most in ww2?

Here is a list of the 10 deadliest weapons of World War II:The Mk 2 Grenade. … Avro Lancaster Bomber. … The M1 Garand Rifle. … The T-34 Tank. … The MG 42. … Katyusha Rocket Launcher. … Hawker Hurricane. … Atom Bomb (Fat Man and Little Boy)More items…•

Did American soldiers use German weapons?

American soldiers were happy to take some German weapons as souvenirs. While not particularly academic, Band of Brothers does a good job depicting American soldiers hunting for Lugers, Hitler Youth knives, or anything else distinctly “Nazi.” Soldiers and Marines in the Pacific did the same with Japanese swords.

How many US tanks were lost in ww2?

From June 6, 1944 through May 15, 1945 for US tank and tank destroyer losses in the European Theater of Operations, United States Army (Western Front): around 7,000 (including 4,295–4,399 M4 tanks, 178 M4 (105mm howitzer), 1,507 M3 Stuart tanks and 909–919 tank destroyers, of which 540 M10 tank destroyers, 217 M18 …

Are there any King Tiger tanks left?

A rare German tank – a veteran from the Normandy campaign of World War Two – has gone on public display at the Tank Museum in Bovington for the first time since its capture. … Unlike the other King Tiger at the museum King Tiger number 280093 saw active service.

What does the gunner say in fury?

The commander will give the order to fire “Fire!” and the gunner will yell “On the way!” so that the loader and commander know to stay clear of the recoil path. It is possible for the commander to let the gunner control the rate of fire, especially if he is also a platoon leader and has to coordinate the battle.

Could a Sherman destroy Tigers?

The most powerful tank of World War II, a single 67-ton Tiger II could hold up a dozen Sherman tanks, and often did. … It could knock out with ease any Allied tank at considerable range, and its armor was so thick (1.58 inches to 7.09 inches) that few British or American weapons could destroy it.

Was Fury a real tank in ww2?

The 3rd Armored Division landed in Normandy on June 24, 1944 with years of training but no combat experience. The colorfully-named tank “In the Mood” was an M4A1 Sherman led by Staff Sgt. …

Was the m4 Sherman a bad tank?

the M4 was not a bad tank, in fact, it was a very good tank. While yes, the M4 had flaws, like generally lackluster armor and a high profile, it also was much better than its competition in many ways. … So, the M4 sherman was a very good tank for its time, considering especially that it had to cross an ocean.

What was the worst tank in ww2?

Covenanter – Britain’s worst tank It was designed in 1939, and looked good on the drawing board with its large wheels, low profile and rakishly sloped armour. Large numbers were ordered as Britain frantically re-armed.

How far could a Tiger tank shoot?

The Tiger Tank was without a doubt the tank which was most feared by the Allied forces during the Second World War. The thing that made this tank so feared and respected was the 88mm gun, which could destroy a Sherman tank at ranges up to 3600 yards – far beyond the range of the guns mounted on the Allied tanks.

Was the Tiger tank better than the Sherman?

As the film makes clear, a Sherman tank was a lightweight in comparison to a Tiger. The Sherman weighed 33 tonnes and had a 75mm gun, compared to the Tiger’s 54 tonnes and a 88mm gun. A Tiger also had 3.9 inch thick armour, so shells from a Sherman literally bounced off it. … Though the film can’t go far enough.

What replaced the Sherman tank?

Medium Tank T20The Medium Tank T20 was part of a series of medium tanks designed by the United States during the Second World War, to be the successor to the M4 Sherman. Successive evolution of the basic design culminated in the M26 Pershing.

Is the movie Fury historically accurate?

The events of the film Fury and its crew were meant to reflect the real experiences of World War II. The commander of ‘Fury’ was Commander ‘Staff Sergeant Lafayette G. ‘Wardaddy’ Pool. … Despite Avery’s desire for historical accuracy, the Tiger ambush scene is the movie is wrong.

Would a Tiger tank beat a modern tank?

Even with a far superior crew, a perfect situation, and an ambush, a Tiger II would have to hit a very small small target at very close range with the best angles to kill a modern MBT.